If you're exploring reading instruction methods, you've probably heard both of these names thrown around. UFLI and Orton-Gillingham keep popping up in conversations about literacy, but they're actually pretty different animals, even though they both get solid results. Let's break down what makes each approach special and figure out which one might be right for your situation.
Understanding UFLI
The University of Florida Literacy Institute approach is based on current research about how the brain learns to read. Think of it as your modern, science-backed solution for helping kids become strong readers from the start. UFLI focuses on five key components: phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. It's comprehensive because it recognizes that reading isn't just about sounding out words. It's about understanding them too.
What makes UFLI appealing is that it works well as a universal program. This means it's designed to help all students in a classroom, not just those struggling. Teachers can integrate it into their regular lessons, and it creates a strong foundation for everyone. The approach gives educators a clear roadmap for what skills to teach and in what order, which takes the guesswork out of reading instruction.
Key Features of UFLI:
Universal program suitable for all students, based on science of reading research, covers five core components, preventative rather than intervention-focused, classroom-friendly implementation, clear instructional sequence
The Orton-Gillingham Method
Now, Orton-Gillingham is a different beast altogether. It's been around since the 1930s, which might make it sound outdated, but don't let that fool you. This method was specifically designed for people with dyslexia, and it's earned its reputation through decades of success stories.
The key difference is that Orton-Gillingham is multisensory. This means it engages multiple learning pathways at once. A student might trace letters while saying the sound, then write the letter while hearing it again. It's like learning through your whole body, not just your eyes.
The method is typically more intensive and often happens in one-on-one or small group settings. It requires specialized training for instructors, which means it's usually not something you'll find as a whole-class curriculum. Instead, it serves as an intervention for students who really need that extra support.
Key Features of Orton-Gillingham:
Multisensory learning approach, specialized for dyslexia intervention, requires trained instructors, typically one-on-one or small group, intensive intervention model, proven effectiveness for struggling readers
How They Actually Differ
Here's where it gets practical. UFLI and Orton-Gillingham share the belief that phonics instruction should be systematic and explicit. They both reject the idea that kids will just pick up reading naturally. But they approach the problem differently.
UFLI is your broad-based, preventative solution. It's like building a strong house for everyone right from the foundation. Orton-Gillingham is more specialized. It's the intensive renovation you do for the rooms that aren't quite working. One isn't better than the other, they're just meant for different purposes.
UFLI covers more ground. It's a complete literacy program touching on comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency alongside phonics. Orton-Gillingham zeros in on the mechanics of decoding with that multisensory focus. Think of UFLI as a five-course meal designed for everyone, and Orton-Gillingham as the specialized nutritional plan for someone with particular dietary needs.
Quick Comparison:
UFLI: Universal program, comprehensive literacy coverage, classroom implementation, preventative approach
Orton-Gillingham: Specialized intervention, multisensory focus, one-on-one or small group, intensive support
Finding Your Path
So which one should you choose? Honestly, it depends on what you're trying to do.
If you're a classroom teacher looking to strengthen reading instruction across your whole class, UFLI gives you a research-based framework that you can implement schoolwide. The systematic approach helps students develop a clear understanding of how sounds and letters work together, which builds confidence and independence in their reading.
If your child has been identified as dyslexic or has significant reading difficulties that haven't responded to typical classroom instruction, Orton-Gillingham might be the game-changer. The intensive, multisensory approach can unlock reading for kids who learn differently. The evidence supporting its effectiveness is solid, particularly for students with dyslexia.
Here's what many schools are figuring out: you don't have to choose just one. Many educators use UFLI as their core classroom program while bringing in Orton-Gillingham principles for students who need extra support. It's like having a reliable baseline instruction for everyone and a specialized intervention ready when you need it.
The Bottom Line
Whether you go with UFLI, Orton-Gillingham, or a combination of both, the important thing is that you're being intentional about reading instruction. Kids deserve to learn to read in a way that makes sense for their brains. Both of these approaches share that core belief, just with different tools and different scopes. The right choice is the one that matches your students' needs and your educational context.
← Back to Blog